Home CSS&PMS Islamiat CSS The Human Rights Violations of the 9/11

The Human Rights Violations of the 9/11

May 20, 2022

1064

The Human Rights Violations of the 9/11 Era Are Still With Us.

The semi-cock flag flies to Guantánamo Bay Naval Base, where 39 Muslim men are held indefinitely. (Alex Brandon/AP Photo)

In response to Palmer’s false career in 1919, the American Civil Liberties Union has learned the hard way: civil liberties and human rights are the first to struggle with war fever. We fought against internal Japanese Americans, survivors of McCarthyism and the Home Un-American Journal of Investigations, and COINTELPRO abuses the FBI.

One week before the tragic 9/11 attacks, I took up a new position as ACLU leader. Although I was still new and unsure, the arrangement itself had been through so many different situations in the past, but it was not. To mark the 20th anniversary of 9/11, the fight for human rights and civil liberties continues to this day. They will lead us on three lessons about the “war on terror”. First, it must be remembered that the American public is aware of and can be used for action. Secondly, civil society and the courts have a vital role in project management. Finally, we need to understand the damage that happened after 9/11. After 20 years, you can not change the page. There is still too much left out there.

With the fall of 9/11, Congress is in a hurry to pass the U.S. Mystery Act, bringing mass security into the new era. Only one Senator — Russ Feingold — had the ability to support his opponent. The attack took place 35 days later and is 342 pages long. Assembly members were later accepted, did not understand or even see them before voting. Some liberal Senators at the time were convinced that they felt the pressure to “stand united” and that President Bush would suffer a national tragedy at that time.

First, members of social media support the governance of the crisis. One NPR correspondent privately told me that America could do everything we could to prevent the next terrorist attack, arguing that the ACLU ‘s strict defense of civil liberties is false. Other news outlets have been slow to address civil liberties issues raised by the 9/11 attacks.

9/11

Then public opinion on War on Terror changed. The local bill for the protection of rights has begun to lay the foundations for a community policy that would condemn more than 400 communities in the Native American Act. All of them that made war grew: massacres; rampant ethnic, ethnic and religious profiling; The FBI is seeking “voluntary” conversations with young Muslims, South Asians and Arabs; the secret “black sites” suspected by the CIA are gone; suspicious sales torture in the countries that tortured us. Each revelation helped to counter the groundbreaking work of the terrorist war against the organization. When photos of Abu Ghraib came to light in April 2004, the US collective conscience began to wane. The big trend came in December 2004, when the ACLU began disclosing documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) explaining its widespread use. and torture. Finally, he essentially concentrated the content of the debates into some remarkable abuses.

While Congress was disappointed and the Bush administration took the country to war, civil society and the Senate played a major role in defending our democracy. In the early days of 9/11, the ACLU seized the FOIA strongly – seeking to release government documents on all issues from torture to prisons to racial profiling. The “X-ray Democracy” FOIA was used to extract secret information from the government, which would obscure how it would wage its War on Terror. Fortunately, we brought together one of the first legal protests for the Patriot Act for a group of copiers.

The Center for constitutional rights has challenged the detention of “enemy fighters” in the port of Guantana. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International are responsible for torture. The ACLU and other groups have interspersed many forms of sectarianism for survivors of torture. The high water standard of judicial decisions since 2008, as soon as the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Guantánamo was not a legal black hole that Bush, Ashcroft and Cheney had in mind. Unfortunately, after ten years we are still fighting many of the same battles.

Thirty-nine Muslims remain in Guantanamo indefinitely – some have been acquitted for years and some have been acquitted of the crime.

The trial is set forth not in the ordinary criminal trial, but in the preceding “military commission”. I reported the first settlement in Guántanamo in 2004, and it appeared to me that military commissions could provide no acceptable version of actual justice. Prosecutors still demand the death penalty in trials that disregard the basic protections guaranteed by the Constitution. And the US government has spent billions of dollars on this failed and unrecoverable legal experiment. It’s time for President Biden to shut down military commissions, shut down Guántanamo and end indefinite military detentions.

The government is using the “no-fly list” primarily against Muslims and handsome people, and people who are wrongly listed do not have a fair process yet. to. Most of the Patriot Act is still law. We must not forget that much of the legal and political infrastructure adopted after 9/11 is still with us today.

In the last two decades, I have learned a lot about the risks of government access, the critical importance of civil society and independent judges, and the enduring legacy of “forever wars.” But most of all, I learned that we can and must maintain our security while respecting civil liberties. When we forget that lesson, we regret it. The future we want must ensure human rights, equality, dignity and accountability, security in words and deeds. Without exception.

Introduction of CSS competitive examination