Home Blog Page 9

M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part II Of 2022

M.A Philosophy

M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part II of 2021.

Introduction

The following Syllabus and Courses of Reading for M.A. Philosophy (External Students) were approved by the Board of Studies in Philosophy. The Detail syllabus of M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part II of 2021 is given below;

M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part II

List Of Part II Subjects

  • Paper I MODERN PHILOSOPHICAL MOVEMENTS
  • Paper II MULSIM THOUGHT IN SOUTH ASIA OR PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION
  • Paper III MODERN METAPHYSICS OR PHILOSOPHY OF MIND OR PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
  • Paper IV PHILOSOPHY OF LAW OR PHILOSOPHY OF ART OR INDIAN PHILOSOPHY
  • Paper V THESIS OR ESSAY

Paper I

MODERN PHILOSOPHICAL MOVEMENTS

1. Logical Positivism:

Turning Point Philosophy, Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language, Criterion of Verifiability

2. Dialectical Materialism:

Matter, Dialectics, Historical Materialsim Theory of Knowledge.

3. Existentialism:

Husserl’s Phenomenological Method, Man in the World, Man and Fellow Man, Man and God, Death (with special reference to Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Sartre).

4. Conceptual Analysis:

Word-meaning, Sentence-meaning, Vagueness, Private Ordinary Language.

Paper II (Opt I)

MUSLIM THOUGHT IN SOUTH ASIA

Introduction:

Islam in the Indian Environment: A Brief Survey of Mutual Interaction especially in the Fields of Mysticism and Metaphysical Thought.

1. Sheikh Ahmad Sirhindi:

i) Metaphysics. (ii) Kalam.

2. Shah Wali Allah:

i) Metaphysics.

  • (a) Concept of God.
  • (b) Cosmology.
  • (c) Unity of Being.

(ii) Mysticism. (iii) Ethics. (iv) Social and Economic Ideas. (v) Philosophy of History.

3. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan:

i) Socio Political back-ground of his ‘Thought. (ii) Significance and Importance of his Revivalism. (iii) Nature as the Overriding principle of his Thought : God, Miracles, Prayer, Prophetic Consciousness.( iv) political , Educational, and Moral views.

4. Iqbal:

(i) Religious Experience: Nature, Characteristics and the Principle of its Verification, Difference between Mystic and Prophetic Forms of Consciousness. (ii) Concept of Ultimate Reality and Its Relationship with the Phenomenal World. (iii) Concept of Ego, its Origination, Development, and Destiny. (iv) Ijtihad: The Principle of Movement in the Structure of Islam.

Paper II (Opt. II)

PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION

  • What is philosophy of religion?
  • Arguments for the Existence of God
  • Divine Attributes: Eternity and Changeless, Omnipotence,Omniscience.
  • Modern Challenges to Religious Relief (Psychoanalysis, Logical Positivism, Marxism)
  • Faith and Reason
  • Nature and Function of Religious Language.
  • Religious Experience
  • Problem of Evil
  • Life after Death.

Paper III (Opt. I)

MODERN METAPHYSICS

  • What is Metaphysics
  • Existence
  • Universal and particulars
  • Linguistic Arguments for Abstracts
  • Changing Things
  • Worlds, Objects and Structure
  • Meaning, Truth and Metaphysics
  • Appearance and Reality
  • Substance
  • Essence and Accident
  • Space and Time

Paper III (Opt. II)

PHILOSOPHY OF MIND

1. Introduction: The Soul and the Mind: The varieties of Mental Phenomenon, The Importance of Philosophy of Mind.

2. The Subject of Consciousness: Dualism: The Traditional Mind-Body Problem, Materialism: Some Difficulties in the Identity Theory, The Person Theory, A Reconsideration of Dualism.

3. Consciousness: The Third-Person and the First Person Account, The Thesis of intentionality.

4. Action:Some Theories of Action

  • (i) Mental Events as the Causes of Actio,
  • (ii) The Theory of Agency,
  • (iii) A performative Theory
  • (iv) Goals as the Explanation of actions Reasons and Causes, Explanations in terms of Desire, Law like Factors, Teleological Explanations.

5. Dreaming: Philosophical Relevance of Dreams.

6. Knowledge of Other Minds

Paper III (Opt. III)

PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION

  • Philosophy and Education: Definition, Nature, and Scope of Educational Philosophy.
  • Aims of Education.
  • Theories of Education
  • Common Confusions in Educational Theory.
  • Education and Indoctrination
  • Moral Education: The Morality of Teaching vs. The Teaching of Morality
  • Freedom and Authority in Education
  • Educational Theory of Iqbal
  • Islamization of Knowledge

Paper IV (Opt. I)

PHILSOPHY OF LAW

1. Introduction: Definition of philosophy of Law. The Nature of Primitive Law. Concept of Law in Greek Philosophy. The Problem of Justice and Legislation in Plato. Aristotle’s Doctrine of Equity.

2. Natural Law: Primitive Law, Natural Law and Technical Law. Philosophical Theories of Natural Law. Stoic Theory of Law and Roman Law.

3. Legal Theory and Social development.

4. Kant’s Legal Philosophy.

5. Antinomies of Legal Theory:

  • i. Stability and Change
  • ii. Voluntarism and Objective Knowledge
  • iii. Individual and the Universe
  • iv. Democracy and Autocracy.
  • v.Nationalism and Internationalism.

6. Positivism: Austin’s Theory of Law. Sovereignty, Law as the Command of the Sovereign. Law in relation to Sanction.

7. Ethics and Law

8. Concept of Law in Islam.

Paper IV (Opt. II)

PHILOSOPHY OF ART

1. Basic Issues in Philosophy of Art:

  • Nature of Scope of Philosophy of Art
  • Artistic Intention.
  • Artistic Expression.
  • Representation.
  • Art and Aesthetic Experience
  • Art and language
  • Art and Truth
  • Art and Craft
  • Aesthetic and Artistic objects and their Content
  • Interpretation and Criticism of Art.

2. Art Movements: Modernism, Romanticism, Expressionism, Dadaism and Postmodernism.

Paper IV (Opt. III)

INDIAN PHILOSOPHY

1. Vedas, Upanishad, Puranas and Gita.

2. Baddhism: Its Metaphysics and Ethics, Hinayana and Mahayana School

3. Six Systems of Indian Philosophy with special emphasis on Yog, Vedanta, and the Theism of Ramanuja.

4. Bhagti Movement.

5. Contemporary Indian Thought: Swami Vivakedande, Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Gandhi, Radakrishnan, Sri Aurobindo Gosh, Modern Western Influence on Indian Philosophers.

Syllabus Of Part I M.A Philosophy

M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part I (2022)

M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part I

M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part I of 2022.

Introduction

The following Syllabus and Courses of Reading for M.A. Philosophy (External Students) were approved by the Board of Studies in Philosophy. The Detail syllabus of M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part I of 2021 is given below;

M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part I

List Of Part I Subjects

  • Paper I                                History of Modern Western Philosophy                                
  • Paper II                               Muslim Philosophy                                                         
  • Paper III                              Moral Philosophy                                                            
  • Paper IV                              Problems of Philosophy                                                               
  • Paper V                               Logic     

Paper I

History of Modern Western Philosophy

Introduction, Characteristics of Modern Philosophy, Continental Rationalism

Descartes:

  • a. Method of Doubt
  • b. Theory of Substance
  • c. Mind-body Relationship
  • d. Proofs for the Existence of God

Spinoza:

  • a. Theory of Knowledge
  • b. Geometrical Method
  • c. Substance, Attributes & Modes
  • d. Intellectual love of God
  • e. Human freedom and Salvation

Leibniz:

  • a. Idealism
  • b. Monadology
  • c. Pre-established Harmony
  • d. Theory of Knowledge
  • e. Optimism

British Empiricism:

Locke:

  • a. Refutation of Innate Ideas
  • b. Origin of Ideas
  • c. Primary and Secondary Qualities
  • d. Modes, Substance and Relations

Berkeley:

  • a) Rejection of Abstract Ideas and of Material Substance
  • b) Subjective Idealism

Hume:

  • a. Impressions and Ideas
  • b. Relations
  • c. Rejection of Material and Mental Substances
  • d. Treatment of Causality

German Idealism:

Kant:

  • a. Copernican Revolution
  • b. Kant’s Problem
  • c. Theory of Knowledge Sensibility, Understanding and Reason
  • d. Antinomies

Hegel:

  • a Dialectical Method
  • b. Absolute

Post-Hegelian Philosophy:

Nietzsche

  • a. Revolt against Traditional Philosophy
  • b. Materialism
  • c. Death of Goad and Nihilism
  • d. Superman and Eternal Recurrence
  • e. Will to Power

Bergson:

  • a. Critique of Mechanised and Teleological Theoriesof Evolution
  • b. Creative Evolution
  • c. Intuition and Intellect
  • d. Elan Vital

William James:

  • a. Pragmatic Method and its Application
  • b. Voluntarism
  • c. Radical Empiricism

Paper II:

MUSLIM PHILOSOPHY

Introduction: Transmission of Greek Philosophy to Muslim Culture

1. Mutazilism

  • Five Basic Principles of Mutazila
  • Some leading Mutazilites
  • (a) Wasil Ibn Ata
  • (b) Abu al Hudhail Alla
  • f(c) Al- Nazzam

2. Asharism

  • i. Concept of God and the nature of Divine Attribute
  • ii. Free will
  • iii. Problem of Evil
  • iv. Problem of createdness or uncreatedness of the Quran
  • v. Asharite Atomism

3. Al-Kindi

  • i. Reconciliation of Philosophy and Religion
  • ii. Concept of God
  • iii. Theory of Intellect

4. Al- Farabi

  • i. Theory of Ten Intelligences
  • ii. theory of the Intellect

5. Ibn-Sina

  • i. Theory of Being
  • ii. Theory of Knowledge/Concept of god
  • iii. Mind-Body Relationship

6. Al Ghazali

  • Method
  • Refutation of Philsophers
    • i. Eternity of the Word
    • ii. God’s Knowledge of Particulars
    • iii. Reseruction of the Body

7. Ibn Rushd

  • a. Reconciliation between Philosophy and Religion
  • b. Metaphysics.
  • c. Way to knowledge

8. Ibn Arabi:

  • Doctrine of Unity of Being

Paper III:

MORAL PHILOSOPHY

1. WHAT IS MORALITY?

  • a. The Problem of Definition
  • b. An Example of Moral Reasoning: Body Jane Doe
  • c. Reason and Impartiality
  • d. The Minimum Conception of Morality

2. THE CHALLENGE OF CULTURAL RELATIVISM

  • a. How Different Cultures Have Different Moral Codes
  • b. Cultural Relativism
  • c. The Cultural Differences Argument
  • d. The Consequences of Taking Cultural Relativism Seriously
  • e. Why There Is Less Disagreement Than It Seems
  • f. How All Cultures Have Some Values in Common
  • g. What Can Be Learned from Cultural Relativism

3. SUBJECTIVISM IN ETHICS

  • a. The Basic Idea of Ethical Subjectivism
  • b. The Evolution of the Theory
  • c. The First Stage: Simple Subjectivism
  • d. The Second Stag
  • e: Emotivism

4. DOES MORALITY DEPEND ON RELIGION?

  • a. The Presumed Connection Between Morality and Religion
  • b. The Divine Command theory
  • c. The Theory of Natural Law

5. THE UTILITARIAN APPROACH

  • a. The Revolution in Ethics
  • b. First Example: Euthanasia
  • c. Second Example: Nonhuman Animals

6. ARE THERE ABSOLUTE MORAL RULES?

  • a. Kant and The Categorical Imperative
  • b. Absolute Rules and the Duty Not to Lie
  • c. Conflicts Between Rules
  • d. Another Look at Kant’s Basic Idea

7. THE ETHICS OF VIRTUE

Paper IV

PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY

1. Introduction:

  • What Philosophy is and why it is worth studying

2. Knowledge :

  • i. Concepts ii. Truth. iii. Sources of Knowledge. iv. What is Knowledge.

3. Cause, Determine and Freedom:

  • i. What is cause. ii. The causal principle. Iii. Determinism and freedom.

4. Some Metaphysical Problems:

  • i. Substance and Universals. ii. Matter and Life. iii. Mind and Body. iv.Personal Identity.

5. Our Knowledge of Physical World:

  • i. Realism ii. Idealism. iii. Phenomenalism. iv. Alternatives.

Paper V

LOGIC

1. Nature of Logic:

Deduction and Induction, Truth and Validity

2. Definition:

Purposes of Definition. Verbal Disputes and Definition, Types of Definition, Rules of Definition

3. Categorical Propositions:

Kinds of Propositions, Traditional Square of Opposition, Immediate Inferences, Existential Import

4. Categorical Syllogism:

Standard Form Categorical Syllogism, Venn Diagram Technique for Testing Syllogism, Rules and Fallacies.

5. Symbolic Logic:

Value of Special Symbols, Symbols for Conjunction, Negation, and Disjunction, Conditional Statements, and Material Implication, Argument Forms and Arguments, Statement. Forms and Statements Paradoxes of Material Implication.

6. Method of Deduction:

Formal Proof of Validity, Rule of Replacement, Inconsistency.

7. Qualification Theory:

Singular Propositions, Quantification, Propositional Function subject Predicate Propositions, Proving Validity.

8. Causal Connections:

Mill’s Methods of Experimental Inquiry, Meaning of Cause, Mill’s Methods, Critique of Mill’s Methods. Defense of Mill’s Methods, Criticism of Stebbing and Russell.

9. Science and Hypothesis:

Value of Science, Explanation: Scientific and Unscientific, Evaluation of Scientific Explanation of Scientific Explanation, Crucial Experiments and Adhoc Hypotheses, Classification of Hypotheses.

M.A Philosophy Syllabus Part II Of 2022

Critical Analysis Of “The Painter” By John Ashbury

The Painter

Critical Analysis Of “The Painter” By John Ashbury

A deep and careful Critical Analysis Of “The Painter” By John Ashbury at the culmination of his poetic talents. Ashbery had god-gifted abilities and capabilities of writing poetry. From the very early career of his poetry, he tried to lay down new ways and rules of expression. His poems are highly thought-provoking and innovative.

Critical Analysis Of "The Painter" By John Ashbury

It is one of the best traits of his poetry that he always writes in paragraph-length – associative structures. This very technique penetrates the essence of the poetry and the structures of sentences penetrate layer after layer deeply into anxieties, doubts, and false beliefs.

He is equal to Spenser, Pope, and Tennyson in his artistic perfection. His artistic perfection is always deep-seated in every line of this poem. In addition to it, there are also two main traits of exactness and directness in his poetry. He becomes a master in his fluency of expression and no other poet is equal in his simplicity of diction. He always writes so, simply that an average reader can easily understand the real feelings and emotions of his personality. How simple and understandable this sentence in its

How simple diction is:

“Sitting between these sea and the buildings

He enjoyed painting the sea’s portrait”

Most of the ideas; expressed by him are easy to inculcate for an average reader. He can imagine an idea even while sitting between the sea and the buildings on the shore. He himself is enjoying the idea of painting a portrait of the sea. His used language in the poetry is so simple that it resembles the language of prose. His poetic language meets the criteria of the language of the prose as said by W. Worth in his theory of poetic diction. He thinks that the sea would itself paint the canvas naturally and automatically like the fulfillment of a child’s prayer. He feels that the people of the buildings allure him to paint the canvas. He is instigated to choose another thing to be painted if not the sea but he is unable to explain his-utter desire (prayer) to them.

He simply utters as: “That nature, not art, might usurp the canvas”.

He has a natural tendency of depicting the real things of nature and prefers nature to art. He does not make any subject or image or idea difficult for his readers to understand. That’s why he always uses an easier subject on the advice of the people. He chooses his wife as a model. But the portrait does not satisfy his ideals and aspirations. Then he dips his brush into the sea and silently prays that his next portrait should be the portrait of the sea itself.

To satisfy his inner mental as well as physical desires, he depicted such kinds of portraits of natural things.

His, this utterance presents clear-cut proof of his inner satisfaction.

“My soul, when I paint this next portrait 

Let it be you who wrecks the canvas”. 

These sentences make the confusion and anarchy of his thought clear. Ashbery was such a kind of poet who wanted to do something extraordinary for humanity, but people did not let him execute or fulfill his desires and aspirations. Whenever he followed them, nature did not follow him and he remained always in great confusion about “what to do”?

His decision of using the sea as a subject spread like news of wildfire among the people of the buildings. It is very painful to see a painter baffled by his subject and his canvas totally unpainted: For this, he was often, made an object of mockery and fun by some other artists. They mock and ridicule him for his inability to choose a subject for his painting. They also say that they will not paint impossible subjects like the sea because it is a stupid and worthless idea. Due to people’s this criticism, he finally decides to lose the idea and the canvas remains blank when he leaves his brush. Perhaps, he becomes a victim of such a view that man proposes while God disposes and man is a plaything in the hands of his fate.

A dreadful howl or vice, at once, rises from the overcrowded buildings; his portrait is hurled down from the tallest building and the sea swallows the canvas, the brush, and his subject remains prayer.

From the above images of his poetry, it becomes clear that Ashbery always paints an accurate life-like picture of his subjects. He tries to give or present a true reflection of the natural surroundings and prefers nature over art. He always writes to satisfy his own inner desires and aspirations just as a bird sings in its own voice for its own delight and pleasure. 

Justify Abigail As A Vamp Or A Victim In”The Crucible”

Abigail In The Crucible

Abigail In The Crucible is seen obsessed with the illusion of replacing her Rival Elizabeth, Abigail Williams, the orphan niece of Reverend Parris, is now a seventeen-year-old girl. Her parents Mr. and Mrs. Williams were cruelly murdered by the cruel Indians of Salem when she was hardly 12. She remained the Proctors’ maidservant till 35year old Elizabeth Proctor fired (dismissed) her in 1692 for having an immoral affair with her 35-year-old husband John Proctor. We are told that Abigail is 17 or so on the eve of her dismissal.

Justify Abigail As A Vamp Or A Victim In"The Crucible"

It was her first love with John Proctor and so she naturally dreamed of marrying him. Abigail naturally becomes the rival of her mistress because it is not her master John Proctor but her mistress Elizabeth Proctor who has ousted her on the charge of adultery with her husband, already the father of 3 sons. Abigail is as such seen as a malicious and revengeful girl. When her cousin Betty falls ill after Reverend Parris finds them dancing, it is in an attempt to protect herself from the punishment that Abigail instigates the Salem witch trials and leads the charge of accusations aimed only at the execution of her rival Elizabeth so that she may become Proctor’s wife as she is dead sure that he still loves her. In her rivalry, Abigail becomes an unabashed (shameless) liar who begins to charge witchcraft against all those who oppose her.

Abigail’s callous nature stems partially from her past trauma (shock) of having Watched the merciless murder of her parents. Abigail is obviously a malicious character. As a laundress (insulting), she shows an endless capacity for dissembling (concealing reality behind a false appearance) as revealed during the progression of her encounters with Reverend Parris, Reverend Hale, and John Proctor.

Before The Crucible begins, John Proctor has already drawn Abigail into the adult world by seducing her.

“I look for John Proctor that took me from my sleep and put knowledge in my heart!”

she cries when John rejects her request for the resumption of lovemaking. His repentance is sincere enough, even if it does not stretch to what he has done to his 17-year-old servant. Elizabeth sees her adulterous husband as a good man being only somewhat bewildered, while Abigail was a prostitute. Being the driving force of the prayer, Abigail’s desire for John is a symbol of the anarchic (irrational) side of life that the Puritans tried so hard to repress. Her thwarted love makes her ruthless. She has already drunk a charm to kill John Proctor’s wife. By blaming Tituba for the adventure in the forest Abigail discovers a more dangerous aspect to the ascendancy; she holds over her friends. When she begins to name the witches, Betty picks up her lead without any instruction. Backed up by her hysterical followers, Abigail controls the adults who have previously controlled her.

ABIGAIL MISINTERPRETS HER FOREST-DANCE CAMPAIGN.

Although Parris urges her to admit all the facts about the girl’s activities in the forest, Abigail only pretends to create a mysterious situation. Parris pleads with her, stating with dignity the seriousness of the situation and stressing the need for truth: “PARRIS: Now tej? me true, Abigail And I pray you to feel the weight of truth upon you, for now, my ministry is at stake, my ministry and perhaps your cousin’s (Betty’s) fife. Whatever abomination you have done, give me all of it now, for S dare. not be taken unaware when! go before them down there. 

ABIGAIL: There is nothing more, I swear’, uncle.”

However, when questioned later by Reverend Hale, it becomes evident that Abigail knows well that “something more than” common dancing’ has taken place at the nocturnal (of the night) meetings in the forest. Her revelations, leading to the

incrimination of Tituba, shows a dissembling (beating around the bush) so extensive on Abigail’s pants that considerable lying is necessary to support the appearance she wishes to present. Abigail has indeed told a series of lies to her benefactor foster uncle Parris, despite his emphasis on the need for truth, and soon this capacity is to be used for incriminating other innocent people.

Superficially, Abigail is anxious to pretend about her ‘name’, or reputation for integrity. Rumors of a relationship with John Proctor have circulated since her dismissal from service in the Proctor household. Parris requests her to tell him the truth about this possible blemish on her reputation: 

“PARRIS: Your name in the town—it is entirely white, is it not? ABIGAIL (with an edge of resentment): Why. I am sure it is, sir. There be no blush about my name.

ABIGAIL’S JEALOUSY AGAINST ELIZABETH TURNS INTO REVENGE 

Abigail attributes any aspersion (slander) cast on her character to Elizabeth Proctor. Abigail claims that John’s wife has tried to treat her like a slave, Abigail pretends that she has rebelled against such an attitude, asserting, in a temper: “My name is good in the village? I will not have it said my name is soiled.’ Goody Proctor is a gossiping liar. But in the brief, dramatically tense dialogue between Abigail and John Proctor when they are alone with the sick child, their past adulterous relationship is made quite explicit. In this encounter Abigail is shown not only to have lied to her guardian but also to have yet possessed a passionate desire to resume her past experience with ) John Proctor. She has a shrewd percipience (perceptive insight) in seeing “John Proctor’s weakness of character. 

So in this short meeting, Abigail shows her active willingness to manipulate Proctor to satisfy her own passion for lovemaking. She reminds him of his own deeply emotional nature, recalling their hidden sexual experiences in the stables of his cattle. She even asserts that he is no “wintry” man in this immoral domain.

She attributes the quality of female frigidity to his wife Elizabeth Abigail has already referred to her earlier as a lie-telling, cold sniveling (tearfully complaining) woman and she repeats this to John.

“ABIGAIL (with a wave of bitter anger): Oh, I marvel how such a strong man may let such a sickly wife be an obstacle in my way. PROCTOR (angered at himself as well): You’ll speak nothing of Elizabeth?  ABIGAIL: She is blackening my name in the village? She is telling lies about me? She is a cold, sniveling woman, and you bend to her?

Abigail’s ability to turn events to her own advantage increases with practice. Her refusal to accept John’s rejection combines fatally with the rising social panic. The accusations eventually bring down her real target; Elizabeth Proctor. Once embarked on this course, Abigail cannot draw back, even when the man she wants is condemned to die. In the end, all she can do is to leave the town in a hurry. With a last, bold gesture she ensures a comfortable future by emptying her uncle’s strong box. Abigail has courage, intelligence, and a magnetic personality, but employs these gifts only in destructive ways. She exerts a totally malign influence on the terrified villagers. Most of them do not realize that the only witch in their midst is Abigail Williams.

ABIGAIL’S DISPLAY OF VIOLENCE 

Abigail always displays a remarkable Firmness of purpose. Her passion, now frustrated by John’s return to sexual Fidelity with His wife is a driving force, a violent, pent-up power that has given her temporary influence over Proctor and a larger influence over the other girls. She is the leader among them When urged by Mary Warren to tell the truth about their activities in the forest and provoked further by Betty’s garbling (confusing words), she reasserts her domination by an act of violence. She takes the sick child Betty who has wandered from the bed to the window and smashes her across:

the face’. It is this tendency to violence that most deeply characterizes. Abigail. The imagery Abigail uses to describe imaginatively her sexual experience with Proctor suggests the mating of wild, hot, untamed animals:

“I know how you Clutched my back behind your house and sweated like a.. i stallion whenever ; came near Or did I dream that? … A wild things may say and do wild things. But not so wild, I think… I have a sense for heat, John, and your sexual heat has drawn me to my window… I cannot sleep for dreaming; I cannot dream but I wake and walk about the house as though I would find you coming through some door. (She clutches him desperately.)”,

Fulfilled passion may have offered a healthful integration of Abigail’s emotions but, since John’s rebuttal (non-acceptance) of her advances of carnal love, the psychological violence is sure to break out into new manifestations. The extension of dissembling and lying to arouse her innate violence require the increasing use of this disintegrative force. Unfortunately, Abigail’s disintegrative force enters the community. Consequently, the reputation of others tends to be blemished, while that of Abigail grows for ‘goodness’. Can any defense be made of such a savagely sexual girl? Arthur Miller has already told us that as a tender baby Abigail had witnessed the murder of her parents:

“I saw Indians smash my dear parents’ heads on the pillow next to mine, and I have seen some reddish work done at night.” 

The psychological impression of violence and its ineradicable finality seem to have remained with her. As an adolescent, to prosecute her private vengeance against Elizabeth Proctor, Abigail connives at judicial murder. And this may seem no unnatural thing to Abigail. She alone is violent enough to run away from the Salem jail. 

ABIGAIL’S TERRORISM FRIGHTENS EVEN THE JUDGES IN THE COURT 

The success of Abigail’s first denunciations, the later trickery to implicate Elizabeth by means of the doll, and her supreme commanding power in the courtroom merely convince her that the form of verbal violence she has by chance discovered is an extremely effective weapon. So effective is it, and so great is her final power in suggesting the violent presence of diabolical disorders, that she can perturb even Deputy Governor Danforth. During the trial in Act Three, when Mary Warren has denied seeing spirits and, by implication, is invalidating the testimony of the girls, Danforth urges Abigail to re-consider her previous statements.

However, his suggestion that Mary Warren may, unintentionally, have harbored illusions is rejected by Abigail as a ‘base question’. Abigail’s utterances in this context are those vehement expostulations that contain further images of violence:

ABIGAIL: I have been hurt; Mr. Danforth; I have seen my blood running out. I have been nearly murdered every day because I have done my duty pointing out the Devil’s people. and this is my reward? Po be mistrusted, denied, questioned like a__

DANFORTH (weakening): Child, I do not mistrust you 

For a moment, the all-powerful Danforth is impressed by her violent remarks and is made defensive. At this, Abigail asserts herself yet more violently by adopting an accusatory attitude to the Deputy Governor:

ABIGAIL (in an open threat): Let you beware, Mr. Danforth. Think you to be so mighty that the power of Hell may not turn your wits? 

Shortly afterward, when Proctor openly accuses her of plotting Elizabeth’s death and enacting the vengeance of a whore, Danforth asks her if she will deny these charges. Abigail replies: “If I must answer that, I will leave this earth and I will not come back again!”

The judge falters before this – new disclosure and seems ready to doubt Abigail’s evidence.

At this point, she steps up to him and asks, “What look do you give me?” Danforth is unable to speak. Abigail is at the height of her power and can easily terrorize Mary Warren’s ‘peeping courage’.

When Abigail manipulates the girls in the court, she is able to make Danforth “horrified’ so that even he grows hysterical. In these encounters with her, his responses state to Deputy Governor Danforth, “That woman will never lie.” He repeats the assertion later: “In, her life, sir, she has never lied. There are women that cannot: sing, and them that cannot weep–my wife cannot lie”.

Then, in an effort to protect her husband’s reputation, Elizabeth sacrifices the principle she holds most dear: she tells a lie and by the terrible irony of the situation, assists in the condemnation of her husband. Elizabeth is both gentle and practical. Despite her pity for the poor rabbit, she kills and cooks it for John’s supper. She tries to save Mary by whipping. After her arrest, Elizabeth gives orders for the household and tries to conceal her fear, concerned more for the children than herself. She is the first to understand Abigail’s intentions and braves her husband’s anger to urge him into action. Unfortunately, it is already too late. 

ELIZABETH CAN NEVER FORGIVE HER HUSBAND’S ADULTERY WITH ABIGAIL : 

Elizabeth’s continual suspicions of her husband render their marriage tense. However, Elizabeth admits that being a sexually frigid (cold), psychologically nagging (fault-finding), and financially demanding woman, her chilly demeanor (conduct) may have driven her husband to adultery. On account of her jealousy of his affair with Abigail, the 17year old niece of Reverend Parris, she has deliberately been cold for him, so her frigidity caused his sexual perversion, Elizabeth’s self-examination has given her a deeper knowledge of her tribulation (suffering) caused by her unjust accusation as a witch, her husband’s imperiling (endangering) himself to save her, her own unintended condemnation of her husband, her imprisonment during pregnancy.

All this has certainly contributed to her painful self-knowledge. Against the general reversal of values in Salem town, a person can only seek and live by inner goodness! With this discovery, Elizabeth’s basic feminine speciousness is reduced. A profound awareness replaces her negative suspicion. Like her husband in the final moments of his life, she has her better now and no human force can take it away. 

ELIZABETH ADMITS HER FRIGIDITY FOR HER HUSBAND 

The period of physical separation and imprisonment, during which Elizabeth’s pregnancy takes its course brings a change in her. When she visits her husband before his execution, she still refuses to judge him, although she is confronted with a situation in which her fundamental principle is opposed. To save his life, John Proctor considers the possibility of telling a lie by signing a confession of his guilt.

Elizabeth is however quietly resolute in the face of this possibility: “It is not my soul, John, it is yours. Only be sure of this, for ! know it now: Whatever you will do, it is a good man does it”. Perhaps her resolution has come from thinking ironically about John’s “goodness” with Abigail. Thus the confounding of her own principle in the courtroom, and the condition of pregnancy have induced her to read her heart. As a consequence, she has become aware of a past ‘coldness’ in her attitude to her husband. As a girl, she had thought herself so plain that she feared she might never marry. So deep had been this sense of inadequacy that, when John did offer her marriage, she did not believe the truth of his proposal and always remained suspicious of him.

In cadenced (musical) prose, possessing the softness of poetry, Elizabeth finally reveals to John with pathetic frankness this aspect of herself:I counted myself so plain, so poorly made, no honest love could come to me! My suspicions kissed you when I did. I never knew how I should say my love to you. It was cold: the house I kept for you… Forgive me, forgive me, John-I never knew such goodness of warm marital love in the world.” It was her continued suspiciousness, a central trait in her character—which founded her feminine frigidity which she called ‘coldness.’

The same may have impelled her husband Proctor to seek the warm arms of Abigail. He is no ‘wintry’ man, and therefore could not be profoundly happy within a ‘wintry’ relationship. When did. Elizabeth realizes this truth? It is only during her three months in prison that Elizabeth comes to realize that her own coldness has provoked John’s adultery. “I never knew how I should say, my love. I kept a cold house. Going against all her beliefs, she lies to save her husband’s reputation, unaware that he has already made his adultery public.

In the last Act, Elizabeth resists all types of pressures: from John himself, from court officials, and from her own longing to save him from the gallows. She insists that her husband must decide for himself. On the other hand, miller gives us two facts about Abigail.

She is strikingly beautiful and she has an endless capacity for dissembling. Abigail is one of a band of Salem girls, most of whom are orphans. Their childhood has been joyless, subject to strict Puritan discipline. Although adolescent, these girls are addressed as ‘child’, willful suppression of their developing sexuality. They suffer the drudgery of adult labor without adult freedom. They cannot work off their energies in the outdoor pursuits available to their brothers, nor express their frustrations. Their rebellion takes the form of expeditions into the danger zone of the forest to arouse the thrill (anxiety) of adults if they are found out doing it.

Critical Analysis Of “The Bee Meeting” By Sylvia Plath

What Were The Human Behavior During War By Hemingway?

What Were The Human Behavior During War By Hemingway?

What Were The Human Behavior During War By Hemingway?

Ernest Hemingway is one of the notable and readable writers of American literature. His philosophical views about life are well-acknowledged v and considered not only by Americans but by people all over the world. His philosophy of life revolves around the oft-quoted quotation but man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated”. This saying of Hemingway was firstly read in his famous novel “The Old Man and the Sea.” In this novel, Hemingway expresses or shows his hero’s attitude toward the human struggle against cosmic forces which prevent man from enjoying victories.

What Were The Human Behavior During War By Hemingway?

What Were The Human Behavior During War By Hemingway? The role of fate or chance is very much evident in Hemingway’s writings. He presents it as a barrier in the way of man’s success. Most of his novels show a pessimistic outlook on life. Most of his heroes face many hardships and setbacks in their hardships and setbacks in their life and finally meet tragic death in most cases. The reason for this is that Hemingway himself had been wounded seriously in the Ist World War. That’s why he had known deeply and aptly that violence was one of the real and rude facts of life. Moreover, he always led his life as a struggle in which man had no choice except to fight. This very situation happened in Santiago’s struggle to fight against the sharks in The Old Man and the Sea. Here Santiago was bound to defeat even after winning his trophy (catching a Marlin). His Jordan is bound to embrace death even after getting his purpose (blowing up the bridge). Jordan fulfills all the set pattern views of Hemingway’s philosophy. He is the most typical hero of Hemingway. From the very beginning of his childhood, he had seen a negro being lunched and this human degradation haunts him even now.

In Spain, he observes similar atrocities committed by man, whether it was Maria’s tale or Pablo’s exploitation. He determined to fight for the interests of man at any cost in the world. He was against Fascists’ policies of trade and business He discarded fascists’ way of trading on the whole sale. It was direct exploitation of basic human rights because their actual belief was in totalitarianism. On certain occasions, he waves in his commitment and feels himself on the horns of a dilemma.

Sometimes, he prefers liquor in order to escape from the necessity of thinking in the arms of Maria. Maria is in hope of a happy life for him. He often postpones his idea of committing suicide just because of thinking of Maria. His mental and physical fatigue compel him to have sexual relations with her. His intercourses with Maria serve as cathartic effects for him and he finds freshness after this. After having done so, he goes back to his mission with a new zeal and enthusiasm. At the ending of the novel, we see that he becomes only an individual who fights for protecting his beloved whom he regards as a symbol for Spain. Actually, here Maria becomes a sole mission for him and he devotes himself wholeheartedly to him.

Hemingway is also of the view that life is a name of sacrifices and man is a puppet in the hands of fate. Man is ultimately bound to defeat sooner or later. The deaths of Elsardo and Anselmo can be best quoted in this regard. All the bloodshed is rendered fruitless for the fascists. Knowing the plans of the republicans, they started wiping out them.

One thing is very worthy to note here that the futility of heroes’ attempts has always been very much evident in Hemingway’s novels. In other simple words, we can say that his heroes always fail at the end of their attempts because they get nothing as the fruit of their attempts. It is also observed in his novels that forces of life are always badly defeated by the forces of evil and pessimism dominates optimism. But Hemingway’s heroes are not defeated or destroyed by these. forces rather they try to overwhelm them.

Actually, Hemingway gives the hero enough courage, dare, and resolution to enable hips to fight or struggle until the end. Moreover, he presents the hero as a man of wisdom and shrewdness. His heroes act wisely and justly. For example, Jordan tries his best to avoid any conflict with Pablo so that his mission may not be disturbed. For the success of his mission performs his duty at any cost whether he lives or dies.

He becomes immaterial and does not pursue worldly gains. Here, we see the philosophy of Hemingway in Jordan’s personality. For him, defeat or victory matters not, the thing matters is a consecutive struggle. Another specification that we see in Hemingway’s heroes is that death becomes an easy solution to the intricate problem of living. Hero’s consecutive work or struggle serves as the psychological satisfaction of his inner motivation and For Whom the Bell Tolls is proof of it.

We also see that there runs a political conflict in Jordan’s thinking. It divides his thoughts. Apparently, he accepts the discipline of communism yet inwardly he adopts or favors the guiding principles of the American constitution like a fraternity, equality, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Red ideology tells him that there is no such thing as love, but Jordan’s case is different because he has experienced genuine love. He has seen what the Loyalist discipline is like and still, he fights for these people.

As we know that Hemingway has thoroughly and deeply thrown light on the concept of the “Lost Generation”. He also called this “Lost Generation” “The Waste Larders”. In the novel under discussion, we see that he gives the idea that heroism, a sense of duty, and a commitment to the human race have suspended the “Lost Generation”.

He is of the belief that if anyone dies as Anselmo and Jordan died then physical death means nothing. Hemingway’s concept of heroism is the concept of optimism because Jordan’s sacrifice is clear-cut proof of the sacrifice for the coming generation. By doing so, he has given a ray of hope to mankind. Santiago of The Old man and the Sea also claims the same when on one occasion he utters:

“It is silly not to hope. Besides I believe, it is a sin. Don’t think about sin” and “I don’t care who kills who?”

In brief, it can be said safelyabout the topic, What Were The Human Behavior During War By Hemingway? that all this above discussion indicates that Hemingway’s message is the message of hope and struggle. He inspires a new spirit of courage, Bravery, and endurance in his readers so that they may cope with the strikes of cosmic forces successfully.

Discuss Significance Of Title Of The Play “The Crucible”By Miller